Federal, state, and local governments all play a significant role in funding $300 billion in annual transportation spending. The federal government supplies important capital funding for highways, transit systems, airports, waterways, and ports while also operating the nation’s air traffic control system. State and local governments have an equally important task to invest in and operate their transportation networks and rely on a broad range of revenue sources, from general revenues and debt, to fuel taxes, fees, and tolls.
House Report 114-129, the explanatory report of the House Appropriations Committee to accompany H.R. 2577, the FY 2016 Transportation-Housing appropriations...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.png00ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 16:32:392023-04-28 14:09:30FY 2016 USDOT Appropriations – House Committee Report
H.R. 2577, the Transportation-Housing appropriations bill for FY 2016, as approved by the House Appropriations Committee and reported to the...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.png00ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 16:31:062023-04-28 14:09:30FY 2016 USDOT Appropriations Bill As Reported in the House
Amendments adopted by the House Appropriations Committee to the draft FY 2016 Transportation-HUD appropriations bill and report.
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-hmkp-114-ap00-20150513-sd004-pdf.jpg14081088ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 16:29:212023-04-28 14:09:30FY 2016 USDOT Appropriations – House Committee Amendments Adopted in Markup
Draft report of the House Committee on Appropriations to accompany the subcommittee-approved bill presented to the full committee for consideration.
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-hrpt-114-hr-fy2016-thud-pdf.jpg14081088ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 16:27:472023-04-28 14:09:30FY 2016 USDOT Appropriations – Draft House Committee Report
Draft FY 2016 Transportation-Housing appropriations bill, as approved by subcommittee and presented to the full committee for consideration.
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-bills-114hr-fc-ap-fy2016-ap00-thud-pdf.jpg14081088ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 16:26:262023-04-28 14:09:30FY 2016 USDOT Appropriations – House Draft Bill in Committee
Memoranda presented to President Ford on November 20, 1975 from White House and Office of Management and Budget staff recommending...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-FY-1976-DOT-Appropriations-Act-WH-bill-memo-pdf.jpg13411020ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 14:56:272023-04-28 14:09:30FY 1976 USDOT Appropriations – White House Enrolled Bill Memo
House Report 94-636, the conference report to accompany H.R. 8365, the FY 1976 Department of Transportation Appropriations Act.
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-FY-1976-DOT-Appropriations-Conference-Report-pdf.jpg1163735ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 14:50:042023-04-28 14:09:30FY 1976 USDOT Appropriations Conference Report
Memorandum from the Bureau of the Budget to President Johnson dated July 8, 1964 coordinating the views of White House...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-PL-88-365-EBF-pdf.jpg40123134ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 06:33:342023-04-28 14:09:291964 Urban Mass Transportation Act – Enrolled Bill Memo
Briefing papers given to President Ford for his December 19, 1974 meeting with his Budget Director to make final decisions...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-FY-1976-Budget-WH-meeting-on-DOT-request-pdf.jpg14391057ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-13 03:00:212023-04-28 14:09:29FY 1976 USDOT Budget – White House Decision Meeting With President Ford
Letter from Secretary Mineta to House and Senate conferees on the SAFETEA surface transportation reauthorization bill defining the parameters of...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-Mineta-letter-to-conferees-pdf.jpg14081088ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-12 04:57:522023-04-28 14:09:292005 (Jun. 7) Letter From Sec. Mineta to SAFETEA Conferees
Federal Highway Administration document providing a side-by-side comparison of the highway provisions of the Administration's SAFETEA proposal, the House-passed bill...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/membersOnly-FHWA-side-by-side-of-engrossed-bills-pdf.jpg14081088ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-12 04:55:132023-04-28 14:09:29Comparison of Highway Provisions – Administration-Senate-House – May 20, 2005
Text of Public Law 627 of the 84th Congress. Title I of the law provided over $25 billion in contract...
https://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.png00ENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATIONhttps://enotrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eno-Logo-2.pngENO CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION2015-09-12 01:40:472023-04-28 14:09:101956 Federal-Aid Highway Act and Highway Revenue Act
Refreshing the Status Quo: Federal Highway Programs and Funding Distribution
This year, the federal government gave $45.6 billion in highway “formula” funding to the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The state-by-state distribution of this money was based almost entirely on how the states fared on a variety of real-world metrics back in calendar year 2007,...