Metropolitan Planning: A History of Success, an Uncertain Future?
Guest op-ed critiquing USDOT’s recent proposed rulemaking to force the consolidation of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) in many areas.
Guest op-ed critiquing USDOT’s recent proposed rulemaking to force the consolidation of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) in many areas.
August 10, 2016 – Of the nine rural TIGER grants awarded at the end of last year, a streetscape project in the City of Live Oak, California stood out as a prime example of how a municipality can leverage their county, state, and federal representatives to successfully navigate the application process – to the tune of $10 million.
This week, we present a matched set of op-eds on DOT’s proposed MPO consolidation rule – one opposed to forced MPO consolidation and one in favor.
Oops! It looks like you’ve reached restricted content.
Access to this resource is available to Eno subscribers, program participants, and/or alumni with the appropriate permissions.
Already a subscriber or participant?
Try logging in to view the content.
Seeing this message but believe you should have access?
Refresh the page to ensure your login is recognized. If the issue persists, please contact us for assistance at publicaffairs@enotrans.org.
Not a subscriber yet? Check out the options to subscribe – we’d love to have you on board!
Guest op-ed expressing the need for the consolidation of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) in many areas.
Big Data can seem complicated because it means many things to many people. But it is not new. At its core, Big Data is still the collection, analysis, and communication of information. What has changed over time is the size, speed, and variety of data which is collected and communicated. However, the challenge lies in using innovative methods to analyze the data and gather meaningful insights which can be used to inform decisions makers.
Implementing a national transportation infrastructure bank (I-Bank) is no small feat. This article looks at the history of the infrastructure bank idea and part two will examine the specifics of past efforts and potential problems and tradeoffs facing future attempts to create an I-Bank.
At a time when the market for new ideas and approaches in transportation is hot, discretionary transportation grant programs matter because they naturally allow for competition and, in turn, a crowdsourcing of solutions. This new type of delivery channel fosters and utilizes the creativity of states and localities, allowing them to craft and execute personalized solutions to their transportation or infrastructure needs.
Oops! It looks like you’ve reached restricted content.
Access to this resource is available to Eno subscribers, program participants, and/or alumni with the appropriate permissions.
Already a subscriber or participant?
Try logging in to view the content.
Seeing this message but believe you should have access?
Refresh the page to ensure your login is recognized. If the issue persists, please contact us for assistance at publicaffairs@enotrans.org.
Not a subscriber yet? Check out the options to subscribe – we’d love to have you on board!
Oops! It looks like you’ve reached restricted content.
Access to this resource is available to Eno subscribers, program participants, and/or alumni with the appropriate permissions.
Already a subscriber or participant?
Try logging in to view the content.
Seeing this message but believe you should have access?
Refresh the page to ensure your login is recognized. If the issue persists, please contact us for assistance at publicaffairs@enotrans.org.
Not a subscriber yet? Check out the options to subscribe – we’d love to have you on board!