Side-by-Side Comparison of Aviation Safety Bills

The following is a side-by-side comparison of the new House ALERT Act and the Senate-passed ROTOR Act, along with what recommendations from the NTSB final report each section deals with.

For detail, please look to bill text – the House bill is here and the Senate bill is here.

House Bill Section

NTSB Rec.

Senate Bill Section

Sec. 1. Names the bill Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency Act of 2026. Sec. 1. Names the bill Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight Reform Act.
Sec. 2. Defines terms. Sec. 2. Defines terms.
Sec. 101. Requires FAA to evalulate the feasibility of lowering the shutoff altitudes of ACAS-Xa. A-26-34 Sec. 4(h) requires FAA to develop an ACAS-X action plan.
Sec. 102. Requires a new rulemaking committee to determine whether to require ACAS-Xa on more types of aircraft. A-26-29, 30, 32, 33, 35 Sec. 4(h) requires FAA to develop an ACAS-X action plan.
Sec. 103. Requires FAA to finalize standards for ACAS-Xr for helicopters. A-26-29, 30, 36, 57 Sec. 4(h) requires FAA to develop an ACAS-X action plan.
Sec. 104. Requires a negotiated rulemaking, resulting in a final rule within 2 years, that requires ADS-B In for all turbine aicraft which are already required to have ADS-B Out, and all civil aircraft in Class B and C airspace, by 12/31/2031, including using portable devices to meet the goal. A-26-31 Sec. 4(a) requires ADS-B In on all aircraft in around the same timeframe.
Sec. 105. Requires joint FAA-NATCA review of ATC supervisors’ time-on-position practices. A-26-8 No provision
Sec. 106. Establishes a working group to review controller training regarding threat and error management, and visual separation procedures. A-26-9, 17 No specific provision, but sec. 4(g) requires new controller training for new separation standards.
Sec. 107. Requires development of a safety risk assessment tool to assist controllers in airspace risk identification, mitigation, and operational decision-making. A-26-10 No provision
Sec. 108. Requires the FAA to review the arrival rate at DCA and, possibly group landing slots into 30-minute increments to avoid exceeding safe capacity. A-26-11, 13 No provision
Sec. 109. Requires use of time-based flow management at Potomac TRACON. A-26-12 No provision
Sec. 110. Requires the FAA-NATCA team to review procedures that determine the classification level of ATC faciilties and possibly revise procedures for DCA and other airports with high volumes of mixed traffic. A-26-15, 16 Sec. 7(b) requires a safety review of DCA more generally.
Sec. 111. Requires FAA to establish a working group to review risks/benefits of requiring a common comms frequency when helicopter and local ATC positions are combined at DCA. A-26-18 No provision
Sec. 112. Requires a FAA feasibility study of new tech that can eliminate the blocking crosstalk effect on radio. A-26-19 No provision
Sec. 113. Requires a FAA task force to improve the conflict alert system to make alerts to controllers more salient and meaningful. A-26-20, 21 No provision
Sec. 114.  Requires the FAA to review and revise ATO procedures for determining whether to order drug and alcohol testing following each postincident/postaccident event. A-26-22, 23, 54 No provision
Sec. 115. Requires the FAA to review and publicize all helicopter route charts annually. A-26-24, 27 No provision
Sec. 116. Requires the FAA to review, and if necessary revise, all helicopter routes near DCA to avoid conflict with fixed-wing routes. A-26-25 Sec. 7(b) requires a safety review of DCA more generally.
Sec. 117. Requires FAA to ensure that ceilings and floors are listed in all helicopter route charts and to add minimum vertical separation requirements to helicopter route chart criteria. A-26-26, 27 No provision
Sec. 118. Requires FAA to study whether to incorporate lateral location and published altitude of helicopter routes into all airport approach procedures. A-26-28 No provision
Sec. 119.Requres a FAA working group to define close proximity encounters and make aggregated information public. A-26-37 No provision
Sec. 120. Requires FAA to notify all parties involved in airborne loss of separation events and provide deidentified event data to the ASIAS program. A-26-37, 38 No provision
Sec. 121. Requries the DOT IG to audit the FAA ATO’s safety culture and SMS and report to Congress. A-26-39, 55. 56 No provision
Sec. 122. Requires FAA to review/revise rules for documentation of combining ATC position responsibilities. A-26-40 No provision
Sec. 123. Requires FAA to review miles-in-trail sepration standards to determine if they are large enough for operaitonal safety and, if not, update the standards. A-26-14 No specific provision, but sec. 4(g) does mandate a new separation rulemaking
Sec. 201-2655. Defines terms used in this new chapter 158 of title 10, U.S.C. (secs. 2655-2660). Sec. 2. Defines terms.
Sec. 201-2656. Requires a new DOT-DOD MOU on ADS-B and collision mitigation tech by 9/30/26 Requires ADS-B Out on all DoD helicopter flithts near DCA unless the a service Secretary personally certifies a waiver. A-26-44, 51, 52, 53 Corresponds to sec. 3.
Sec. 201-2657. Requires new rotary wing aviation safety management systems in each military department. No provision
Sec. 201-2658. Requires training on flights near congested airspace, possibly to incorporate historical flight datal No provision
Sec. 201-2659. Requires DoD to coordinate with FAA on new flight data monitoring programs. Sec. 8 deals with FAA-DOD safety information sharing.
Sec. 201-2660. Clafifies that DOT has no authority under title 10 and DoD has no authority under title 49. No provision
Sec. 202. Repeals old FAA-Army MOU and associated section in 2019 NDAA upon effective date of new MOU. Sec. 9. Replaces the old FAA-Army MOU with new regulations and repeals associated section of 2019 NDAA.
Sec. 203. Repeals 10 U.S.C. 2654. Sec. 5. Repeals 10 U.S.C. 2654.

Search Eno Transportation Weekly

Latest Issues

Happening on the Hill