Affordable Housing and Transit:
A City-by-City Series
Public transportation and affordable housing are natural complements. When combined, affordable housing near transit can reduce resident dwelling expenses while also reducing their transportation costs— a win-win for residents and an opportunity for more people to afford a higher quality of life. Moreover, transit-oriented development (TOD) can encourage more transit ridership, thus reducing congestion, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and improving the financial performance of transit agencies.
While TOD can improve access and mobility, it can also increase housing prices, which poses the risk of gentrification. Identifying mechanisms to encourage TOD that incorporates affordable housing on site is a potentially valuable strategy to promote the fiscal and environmental health of communities across the United States.
Over the past year, Eno’s Affordable Housing and Transit case study series has examined how regions across the country promote transit-oriented development and affordable housing. This series explores how agencies across the country navigate the world of affordable housing and transit, including how they coordinate housing, land-use, and transportation policies, barriers they encounter, and key lessons learned. Each case study draws on local data and policy documents to provide a detailed and comparative account of TOD and affordable housing in a particular region.
Each case study was published as an individual article, available below, and the series concluded with a webinar.
Denver
Austin
Bay Area
Chicago
Huntsville
Minneapolis/St. Paul
New Jersey
Raleigh
Salt Lake City
Seattle
Webinar: Advancing Transit Oriented Development
About ETW
Eno Transportation Weekly is the flagship publication of the Eno Center for Transportation, an independent, nonpartisan think tank. Since 1921, Eno has worked to improve transportation policy through research, analysis, and leadership development. ETW is written by Eno’s policy staff and read by professionals across the transportation field — in Congress, federal and state agencies, industry, academia, and advocacy.
ETW does not represent the views of any party, administration, or stakeholder interest. Its analysis is independent.
