CBO Issues Summary of Trump FY20 Budget Request
May 10, 2019|Jeff Davis
May 10, 2019
Yesterday, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its analysis of President Trump’s fiscal year 2020 budget request. In its top-level overview, CBO projects that over the coming decade, the President’s policies would result in federal spending being $2.3 trillion below its current “baseline” spending levels, while federal tax revenues would only be $882 billion below baseline. This would result in federal deficits being, collectively, $882 billion lower than the baseline over the coming decade.
However, many of the specific proposals are politically unlikely. Congress is unlikely to agree to reduce non-defense discretionary spending by an average of $104 billion per year over a decade (below baseline), as the President proposes, and they are even more unlikely to reduce funding for health care by an average of $148 billion per year. (The President’s plan to increase defense spending by $522 billion above baseline over ten years is more likely to be successful, but that would increase deficits, not lower them.)
CBO indicates that the $200 billion placeholder of mandatory budget authority in 2020 in the budget for an infrastructure initiative would “spend out” slowly only $114 billion in outlays over ten years, or a ten-year outlay rate of 57 percent.
On the revenue side, most of the $872 billion in costs of extending the 2017 tax cuts beyond their expiration in 2025 are more likely than not to happen, but the President’s other proposals are much less certain.
|vs CBO||vs CBO|
|Outlay Changes||Revenue Changes|
|Hold down non-defense discretionary spending||-1,044||Extend 2017 tax law changes after 2025||-872|
|Increase defense discretionary spending||+522||Modify Affordable Care Act||-181|
|Reduce health care funding||-1,483||Increase federal retirement contributions||+123|
|Infrastructure initiative||+114||Establish Education Freedom Scholarships||-46|
|Reduce student loan subsidies||-109||Increase tax enforcement funding||+42|
|Reduce income security funding||-101||Other proposals||+53|
|Postal Service reform||-49||Total Revenue Changes||-882|
|Effect of budget on net interest||-175|
|Total Outlay Changes||-2,346||TOTAL DECREASE IN UNIFIED DEFICIT||-1,464|
Highway Trust Fund. As part of that $1.044 trillion in holding down outlays from discretionary spending for ten years, the budget request called for flat-lining the spending authority for Highway Trust Fund accounts starting in 2021 at the 2020 levels, instead of letting them grow annually with inflation. (See Table 30-1 in the budget request for the year-by-year amounts starting on page 275.) The obligation limitation on federal-aid highways would be frozen at $45.1 billion per year; mass transit frozen at $11.5 billion per year, and so forth.
CBO has released a projection of HTF cash flow based under the President’s spending freeze. However, it takes a long time for the cash flow effects of the spending freeze to be noticed. (Tax receipts are unaffected by the President’s budget.) CBO (very unhelpfully) rounds its HTF cash flow estimates to the billion dollars, but here are the changes in cash flow caused by the President’s proposed spending freeze, compared to the May 2019 baseline:
|Highway Account – Baseline||47||48||48||49||50||51||52||53||54||55|
|Highway Account – Request||47||47||47||48||47||48||47||47||47||47|
|Mass Transit Account – Baseline||10||11||11||11||12||12||12||12||12||13|
|Mass Transit Account – Request||10||11||11||11||11||11||11||11||11||11|
As a result, the ten-year bailout cost of the Trust Fund would be $34 billion lower under the President’s freeze than it would be under the baseline. But a freeze starting in 2021 would not measurably affect the date at which the Trust Fund will next run out of money (summer or early fall 2021).
|End-of-FY 2029 Cumulative Shortfall|
|Mass Transit Account||-47||-42|
September 21, 2023 | Jeff Davis
September 21, 2023 - The House Budget Committee approved a budget-balancing federal fiscal blueprint this week relying on massive spending...
August 4, 2023 | Jeff Davis
August 4, 2023 - For decades (starting in the 1980s), a group of states, mostly from the Sun Belt, habitually...
July 18, 2023 | Jeff Davis
July 18, 2023 - This is a list of every mention of transportation user charges in a Presidential budget message,...
June 2, 2023 | Jeff Davis
Sometime before Monday morning, President Biden is expected to sign into law H.R. 3746, the “Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023,”...
May 26, 2023 | Jeff Davis
May 26, 2023 - White House and Congressional negotiators are rumored to be close to a deal to increase the...
May 19, 2023 | Jeff Davis
May 19, 2023 - The House Appropriations Committee started the fiscal 2024 appropriations process this week, marking up bills in...
May 12, 2023 | Jonathan Hammond
May 12, 2023 - The Eno Center for Transportation has selected Glendedora Dolce as our 2023 Thomas J. O’Bryant Fellow....
April 26, 2023 | Jeff Davis
April 26, 2023 - The House of Representatives has passed the Republican debt ceiling bill (H.R. 2811), which provides a...
April 21, 2023 | Jeff Davis
April 21, 2023 - House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) this week introduced the text of legislation to increase the statutory...
March 17, 2023 | Jeff Davis
March 17, 2023 - By and large, the Biden Administration's budget request for fiscal year 2024 does not deliver amounts...
March 17, 2023 | Jeff Davis
March 17, 2023 - The fiscal 2024 transportation budget request was mostly devoid of new policy proposals, but mass transit...
March 10, 2023 | Jeff Davis
March 10, 2023 - In broad strokes, the White House's fiscal 2024 budget request for the U.S. Department of Transportation...